You Betcha and in a big way !
A few months back I followed a local news story with great interest. It all started when a group of teenage girls right here in my backyard near Pittsburgh, PA simply embarrassed or maybe I should say, simply buried giant retailer Abercrombie & Fitch.
This story, now known as the " Abercrombie & Fitch Girlcott" quickly rocketed onto the national newsfront and was featured on virtually all the major network and cable news shows.
In short here is what happened:
Big Retailer A & F was selling a new line of young ladies tops referred to as " Attitude Shirts." Although they were stylish in design to the teen set there was, according to these girls, one major problem. The tops were called "Attitude Shirts" because of some of the various messages imprinted on the front of them. For example there was one style with the quip, " Blondes Are Adored, Brunettes Ignored." Then there was another that said, " Who Needs Brains When You Have These ?"
There were numerous others but you should get the idea by now. Well, these young ladies contended that the "Attitude" shirts were at best insensative and degrading so they decided to cop thier own attitude.
Now, what does this have to do with 'older job seekers ?"
Job seekers over 40 (baby-boomers) are members of the most educated and prevailing group of citizens in the USA. This is fact just by the virtue of thier sheer numbers in terms of population, not to mention financial strength and potential politcal clout. If such a fragmented group were to nationally organize as a labor front, the boomers could swing an election in a heartbeat or bring down a big, big corporation in a New York minute.
Over the past 5 years or so I have read many forum threads on the Internet regarding "ageism" and the job market. These threads are from seemingly hopeful yet angry job seekers contending that corporate America is denying them opportunity because of thier age, that being the over 40 crowd. In some cases that is undoubtedly true. Other times I am also certain that age would not have been a factor in the hiring decision.
Let's face it, any type of discrimination regarding employment is unethical and illegal. It is out there and from what I have read and heard from people it does appear to have some merit and crosses all lines to include race, religion, veteran status or national origin. And probably some other things I did not mention.
To the vast number of baby-boomers who believe they have been discriminated against due to age, yes it is illegal, yes you are told you are a "protected class" in employment status, and yes; there are government agencies and non-profit groups who are supposedly looking out for your interests. Good luck getting anywhere, because you simply have not organized and made enough noise for any of these agencies or not-for-profit groups to really feel the need to do much about it.
Now to my point. Those teenagers and thier "Girlcott" got things done and quickly I might add. They know that negative publicity and money talks and in a big way. Like one 14 year old young lady stated, " If our efforts to have those shirts removed from the stores don't work, we going to make something happen because that is the type of people we are." Abercrombie & Fitch caved in very quickly.
To the boomers who truly believe they are being denied employment because of thier age, you could learn a lesson from those young girls because they are Guerillas in every sense of the word.
In closing and oddly enough, I would be willing to bet that a substantial amount of money those kids not only spent and then threatened not to ever spend again at Abercrombie & Fitch, actually did or eventually would have come out of the pockets of people over 40.
Contributed by:
Mark J. Haluska
Executive Director
Real Time NetWork
http://www.rtnetwork.net